Niger J Paed 2016; 43 (1):8 – 13
ORIGINAL
Okonkwo IR
Scope of neonatal care services in
Abhulimhen-Iyoha BI
major Nigerian hospitals
Okolo AA
DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/njp.v43i1.2
Accepted: 12th October 2015
Abstract : Background: Neonatal
cilities, 34 (63%) were located in
survival bespeaks the quality of
state capitals and 47 (87%) in pub-
Okolo AA
(
)
neonatal care services available
lic hospitals. Half of the evaluated
Okonkwo IR
and accessible to the population.
units belonged to Class I, 22
Abhulimhen-Iyoha BI
Department of Child Health,
Intensive care improves outcome
(40.7%) Class II, and 5 (9.3%)
University of Benin Teaching Hospital,
of high-risk infants with serious
Class III levels of neonatal care.
PMB1111
illness. The tiered level of care is
Majority (81.6%) of the doctors
Benin City, Nigeria
yet to be applied to newborn care
have been trained on neonatal re-
Email: angelneneo@yahoo.com
in Nigeria. Classification of care
suscitation; with senior residents
is key to improving neonatal sur-
being the highest 49 (89%) and
vival with enhanced referral of
Medical officers (MO) the least 4
high-risk patients to higher-level
(40%) trained. Doctors with train-
centres.
ing in mechanical ventilation
Objective: To ascertain the scope
(MV) were 39.2%; Consultants
and classify available newborn
(51.2%), MO’s the least 1(11.2%)
services offered at major Nigerian
trained (p=0.025). Monitoring is
hospitals.
usually by pulse oximeters 54
Methodology: A semi-structured
(100%), multi parameter monitors
validated questionnaire was ad-
23 (42.6%) and rarely ABGs 6
ministered to attendees during
(11%).
2015 Pediatric Association of
Conclusion: Neonatal care in Ni-
Nigeria conference. The informa-
geria is still developing. Most cen-
tion derived was used to catego-
tres provide basic neonatal care
rize neonatal care services.
services. Regionalization of care
Results: The respondents con-
may be the solution to higher level
sisted of doctors 201 (84.8%) and
neonatal care.
nurses 36 (15.2%) in 54 health
facilities from all geopolitical
Key Words:
Neonatal Care;
regions of Nigeria. Of the 54 fa-
Scope
Introduction
such key specialists. Whatever the situation, team
members must be able to provide Neonatal resuscitation.
Neonatal survival is relative to the level of accessible
Of the three essential functions key to the survival of the
neonatal care in a community
1-2
and the availability of
Newborn, respiration is of prime importance. Thus ca-
neonatal intensive care has improved the outcomes of
pacity for and availability of ventilator support is key in
high-risk infants.
3-7.
the provision of any form of life support system or in-
Neonatal care in Nigeria has improved significantly
tensive care for sick new-borns. The other two functions
from the early 1970s when only six teaching hospitals
of feeding and thermal support can be provided through
offered such services. Currently, a large number of fa-
adaptations that include gavage enteral feedings of ex-
cilities provide similar services in different locations in
pressed breast milk and Kangaroo mother care.
the country. The quality of care provided by these cen-
Level 1: Basic care unit provides evaluation and
tres are, however, not uniform. Hitherto, there has been
postnatal care of healthy new-born infants; and
no attempt to classify these centres according to the
Phototherapy; Care for infants 34-35W>1800gm with
level of services offered.
mild illness and these units can initiate IV lines,
administer and monitor Oxygen saturation
Neonatal care facilities should be classi fied on the basis
Level 2: Special care new-born nursery
of functional capabilities, and should be organized
Cares for infants of greater than 32 weeks gestation or a
8-11
within a regionalized system of perinatal care
. In the
weight of 1500 g or greater who are moderately ill; they
current context, Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is
can provide CPAP, Intravenous infusion, and possibly
specialized in the care of ill new-borns and manned by
the use of umbilical central lines.
9
Level 3: Intensive neonatal care unit
spondent, information about their practice location, neo-
Provides: care for very ill infants of all gestational ages
natal unit capacity, personnel, trainings in newborn
and weights; Mechanical ventilation (MV) support, for
cardio-pulmonary resuscitation and maintenance of car-
as long as required and immediate access to the full
diovascular stability, equipment’s available for key sup-
range of subspecialty consultants. Ability to monitor
port of critically ill neonates, especially for newborn
fully the critically ill new-born using multi-parameter
thermal control, respiratory support cardiovascular stabi-
monitors and to measure Arterial Blood gasses (ABG).
lization and monitoring devices for care and support of
This definition is adapted from the AAP guidelines to
babies on these interventions was administered to atten-
meet with available resources in a developing commu-
dees. Information on parenteral alimentation was not
nity. This standard of tiered level of neonatal services as
sought for neither were issues on modalities of case
contained in the policy statement of the American Acad-
management sought after.
emy of Pediatrics and utilized in developed communi-
8
The availability of surfactant replacement service was
ties is yet to be applied in Nigeria.
also solicited. The responses were weighted according to
the status of the respondents and completeness of solic-
Classification of newborn care services is key to im-
ited information. Consultant with neonatal training were
proving neonatal survival as this offers the opportunity
considered key informants.
of enhanced referral of high-risk patients to higher-level
The care facilities were classified according to the level
centres with the appropriate resources for complexity of
of sophistication of services available using the AAP
criteria for categorization of levels of care. The data
8
care. A documentation of the services provided by dif-
8
ferent neonatal units in the country is helpful in estab-
gathered were entered into an IBM/ SPSS spreadsheet
lishing the scope and quality of available newborn care.
and analyzed.
Quality of newborn care by level of services offered is a
critical determinant of neonatal outcomes.
1-2
Aim
Results
To ascertain the scope and classify the quality of new-
A total of 250 questionnaires were distributed during the
born services available at major Nigerian hospitals.
conference and 237 were returned. The return rate of the
questionnaires was 94.8%.The respondents comprised
Specific Objectives:
doctors and nurses working in Paediatric and Neonatal
1.
To ascertain the standard of neonatal services avail-
facilities in Nigeria. There were 90 (38.0%) males and
able at major hospitals
147 (62.0%) females.
2.
To categorize these services by level of available
The geopolitical regions of the 237respondents are as
resources for Neonatal care
follows: South-South 59(24.9%), South-East
85(35.9%), South-West 30(12.7%), North-Central 43
(18.1%), North-East 3(1.3%), North-West 10(4.2%), No
response 7(3.0%); whilst 218(92.0%) were Christians
Methods
and 16(6.8%) Muslims. Other characteristics of the re-
Study Design
spondents are shown in Table 1.
A questionnaire based descriptive study was conducted
Table 1: General Characteristics of the Respondents
Validation of the questionnaire
Characteristics
Number (%)
Total (%)
Doctor
Consultant
96 (40.5)
After the development of the questionnaire, it was field
Senior Registrar
59 (24.9)
tested with medical students, nurses and midwives,
Registrar
35 (14.8)
Medical Officer
11 (4.6)
201 (84.8 )
house officers, resident doctors and consultants in the
Nurse
ADNS
5 (13.9)
Department of child health. This was to ensure validity
CNO
5 (13.9)
of the responses and questions for which the answers
ACNO
5 (13.9)
were not reproducible were eliminated.
SNO
8 (22.2)
NO-I
1 (2.8)
NO-II
12 (33.3)
36 (15.2)
Ethical Considerations
Type of practice
Public
208 (87.8)
Private
26 (11.0)
The study proposal was approved by the ethical commit-
No response
1 (1.2)
Level of practice
Primary
5 (2.1)
tee of the University of Benin Teaching hospital.
Secondary
26 (11.0)
At the 2015 edition of the Pediatric Association of
Tertiary
199 (83.9)
Nigeria (PAN) Conference that held in Abakaliki,
No response
7 (3.0)
Ebonyi state, after the general information of the essence
of the study was explained to the participants, informed
ADNS: Assistant Director of Nursing services, CNO: Chief
consent was obtained and the willing participants ac-
Nursing Officer, ACNO: Assistant Chief Nursing Officer,
cepted to fill out the anonymous questionnaire.
SNO: Senior Nursing Officer, NO: Nursing Officer.
The
validated semi-structured questionnaire that as-
sessed basic social demographic information of the re-
Of the thirty six states of the federation and Abuja, Pae-
diatric and Neonatal personnel from twenty nine states
10
returned the questionnaires. The states without respon-
Table 3: Respondents location by Unit capacity, Level, Type and
dents were Adamawa, Bauchi, Benue, Jigawa, Niger and
Respiratory support capacity of Neonatal units
State
City
Respon-
Leve
Type of
Bed
Respira-
Level
Yobe; hence their neonatal care services were not as-
dent(s)
l of
Practice
Capac-
tory
sessed. These states are in the North-East, North-Central
care
ity
support
available
and North-West geopolitical regions of the country.
3
0
Kaduna
Zaria
3
Public
30
Full
II
3
0
Table 2 Shows the location of respondents (states &
Kano
Kano
1
Public
38
Full
II
3
0
Katsina
Katsina
1
Public
24
Partial
II
cities), the functional and other details of their neonatal
3
0
Kogi
Lokoja
4
Public
18
-
I
units. The respiratory support capability of the units
3
0
Kwara
Ilorin
2
Public
35
Full
II
3
0
consisted of (Full Mechanical Ventilation (MV) Capac-
Lagos
Ikeja
5
Public
50, 30
Full
II
1
0
Idi-Araba
80
Full
II
ity; Availability of MV and Continuous positive Airway
2
0
Mainland
8
-
I
1
0
pressure [CPAP]. Partial Capacity; as defined by Stand-
Isolo
Private
13
Full
III
3
0
Others
7
Private
3-13
Full
II
3
0
alone CPAP only available). These information facili-
Nasa-
Keffi
6
Public
25
-
I
rawa
tated the categorization of the proposed level of neonatal
3
0
Ogun
Abeokuta
3
Public
40
-
I
3
0
care.
Shagamu
Public
28
-
I
2
0
Ondo
Akure
3
Public
25
-
I
3
0
Table 2: Respondents location by Unit capacity, Level, Type
Owo
Public
16
-
I
3
0
Osun
Oshogbo
Public
28
-
I
and Respiratory support capacity of Neonatal units.
3
0
Ile-Ife
Public
25
Full
II
3
0
State
City
Respon-
Level
Type of
Bed
Respira-
Level
Ilesha
Public
20
-
I
3
0
dent(s)
of
Practice
Capac-
tory
Oyo
Ibadan
4
Public
40
Full*
II
3
0
care
ity
support
Ogbo-
-
Public
25
-
I
available
mosho
3
0
3
0
Abia
Umuahia
11
Public
30, 18
Partial
II
Plateau
Jos
1
Public
15
Full
II
3
0
2
0
Aba
-
Public
24
-
I
Rivers
P/H
11
Public
30, 45
Full*
II
3 ǂ
0
3
0
Akwa
Uyo
1
Public
45
-
I
P/H
3
Private
4
I
2 ǂ
0
Ibom
Bonny
1
Private
2
Full
II
3
0
Anam-
Awka
11
Public
16
-
I
island
3
0
bra
Nnewi
-
Public
30,45
Full*
II
3
0
Sokoto
3
Public
25
Full
II
3 ǂ
0
Zamfara
Sokoto
3
Public
10, 30
Full
I
3
0
Bayelsa
Yenogoa
2
Public
14,
-
I
2
0
Gusau
Public
10
Partial
II
3
0
Borno
Maiduguri
1
Public
22
Full
II
3
0
FCT
Abuja
23
Public
20-60
Partial
II
3
0
3
0
Cross
Calabar
4
Public
35
-
I
G/wlada
-
Public
40
Full
I
2 ǂ
0
River
Abuja
7
Public
10,12,2
Partial
II
2 ǂ
0
3
0
Delta
Asaba
19
Public
20
Partial
I
Private
7-20
Full
III
Abuja
2
0
Warri
4
Public
20
-
I
No
2
0
-
Private
5
Partial
II
Response
9 (3.8)
10 (4.2)
4 (1.7)
(%)
3
0
Oghara
-
Public
20
Full
III
3
0
Ebonyi
Abakaliki
33
Public
30
-
I
*available none functional MV, P/H = Port Harcourt
3
0
Edo
Benin City
14
Public
50
Full
III
G/Wlada = Gwagwalada
2
0
Irrua
-
Public
Full*
I
3
0
Public
23
-
I
3
0
Ekiti
Ado- Ekiti
4
Public
15
-
I
Only 20 (37%) of facilities were located outside the state
3
0
Ido- Ekiti
Public
37
-
I
3
0
Enugu
Enugu (1)
21
Public
50, 40
Full
III
capitals; while 7 (13%) were private outfits. The capac-
Enugu (2)
35, 20
-
I
3
0
Gombe
Gombe
2
Public
18
Full
II
ity to offer one form or the other of respiratory support
3
0
Imo
Owerri
9
Public
40, 20
Full*
II
partially or full was available in more than 60%of the
Orlu
21
I
facilities surveyed.
The neonatal unit capacities ranged from 2-80 cots. The
Although in the public sector, tertiary were in the major-
private health facilities have smaller neonatal units (<5
ity, half 27 (50%) of the units belonged to level I, 22
cots) and the largest private unit have 20 cots spaces.
(40.7%) level II, and 5 (9.3%) level III class of neonatal
The public tertiary facilities have units ranging from 14-
care. The highest proportion of level I units 10 (37%)
80 cot capacity. All units above 30 cots capacity are in
were in the SW region, level II 5 (22.7%) also in the
public tertiary health facilities.
SW, while level III units 2 (40%) were in the SS region.
The 54 health institutions of these respondents were
Three (60%) of the level III units are public facilities
headed by a neonatal Paediatrician.
while 2 (40%) are private healthcare facilities.
The distribution of the respondents units by the geopolitical
The details of the Neonatal resuscitation training of re-
regions, type and level of practice, and their respiratory sup-
spondents who are doctors are shown in Table 5.
port capacity are shown in Table 4.
Table 4: Geopolitical distribution of the respondent units by Respiratory support
Neonatal Resuscitation training information were omit-
capacity and Level of neonatal care.
ted by 9 (4.5%) of the doctor respondents, 164 (81.6%)
Geopolitical n
Capital
Public
Partial
Full
Level (%)
were trained on Neonatal resuscitation. Senior residents
Region
(%)
City (%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
I
II
III
S-S
13(24.1)
8(61.5)
10(76.9)
4(30.8)
5(38.5)
8(61.5)
3(23.1)
2(15.4)
were the highest 49 (89%) and Medical officers the least
S-East 9(16.7)
6(66.7)
9(100.0)
2(22.2)
3(33.3)
5(55.6)
3(33.3)
1(11.1)
4 (40%) trained. For the Nurse respondents, 3 (8.3%)
S-West 16(29.6)
7(43.8)
13(81.3)
4(25)
6(37.5)
10(62.5)
5(31.2)
1(6.3)
did not provide the Neonatal Resuscitation training in-
N-Central 8(14.8)
6(75.0)
7(87.5)
3(37.5)
3(37.5)
3(37.5)
4(50.0)
1(12.5)
formation. Less than two thirds 22 (61.1%) were trained
N-East 2(3.8)
2(100)
2(100)
2(100)
2(100)
-
2 (100)
-
on Neonatal resuscitation.
N-West 6(11.1)
5(83.3)
6(100)
2(33.3)
4 (66.7)
1(16.7)
5(83.3)
-
54
4 (63)
47 (87)
17 (31)
23
7(50)
22(40.7)
5(9.3)
The distribution of the training among the different
(42.6)
cadre of Nurses is shown in Table 5.
ǂ Units offering multiple level of care. ٭ Nonfunctional MV equipment.
11
Table 5: Neonatal Resuscitation training of Respondents
(55.6%) units are level III, while 4 (44.4%) are level II
Health
n
Trained
NRT
HBB
NRT/
Others
neonatal care facilities.
personnel
(%)
HBB
Doctors
Table 7: Respondents location by Pulse oximeter, Multi-
Consult-
92
82 (89.1)
43
4
32
3
parameter monitors, ABG, and Surfactant services availability.
ants
Location City Pulse n(%) Multi-parameter ABG
Surfactant
Residents
90
78 (86.7)
61
2
14
1
n
oximeters
monitors n(%)
n (%) services n(%)
Medical
10
4 (40)
4
-
-
-
SS
13
13 (100)
6(46.2)
4 (30.7)
3 (23.1)
Officers
SE
9
9 (100)
4(44.4)
- (0.0)
2 (22.2)
No re-
9
SW
16
16 (100)
4(25.0)
1(6.3)
3 (18.8)
sponse
NC
8
8 (100)
6(75.0)
1(12.5)
1 (12.5)
Sub-Total
20
164
108
6 (3.7)
46
4 (2.4)
NE
2
2 (100)
1(50.0)
- (0.0)
- (0.0)
1
(81.6)
(65.9)
(28.0)
NW
6
6 (100)
2(33.3)
- (0.0)
- (0.0)
Nurses
54
54 (100)
23(42.6)
6(11.1)
9 (16.7)
Senior
15
11 (73.3)
9
1
1
-
Cadre
NO. Cadre
18
11 (61.1)
9
1
1
-
No re-
3
9
-
sponse
Sub-Total
36
22(61.1)
18
2 (9.1)
2 (9.1)
Discussion
(81.2)
Neonatal care in Nigeria has made progress. This assess-
Of the 201 doctor respondents, 181 (90%) indicated
ment highlights availability and scope of services pro-
their Neonatal Ventilation training information out of
vided in neonatal units in Nigeria, each functioning at
which 71 (39.2%) were trained. Consultants 42 (51.2%)
different levels of sophistication. The response rate of
are the highest trained cadre and the medical officers the
95% was much higher than a similar survey in the US .
12
least 1(11.2%) trained on neonatal mechanical ventila-
The respondents comprising mostly of doctors (85%)
tion.
and female health workers, reflecting the composition of
There is a significant relationship between increasing
participants at this conference. The nurses’ respondents
level of paediatric specialization and mechanical ventila-
(15.2%) maybe reflective of interest in knowledge up-
tion training as shown in table 6.
date of pediatric care and development.
Out of 36 Nurse Respondents, 32 (88.9%) completed
As expected, more of the respondents (35.9%) were
their Neonatal ventilation training information. Only 6
from the South-East (SE) states due to proximity to the
(18.8%) of them are trained with Nursing Officers II
conference location while the least (1.3%) were from the
(NO-II) being the highest 4 (40%) trained cadre and the
North East (NE) states which is farther away. The rela-
Assistant Director of Nursing services (ADNS) and
tively high representation of the Neonatal facilities lo-
Chief Nursing Officers (CNO) being the cadre without
cated in in the South West may be a true reflection of
Neonatal ventilation training. This is shown in Table 6.
the availability of neonatal services in that region. The
paucity of respondents and facilities from the NE region
Table 6: Neonatal Ventilation Training of Respondents
may be due to the restriction of movement in that region
Health Staff
n
Mechanical Ventilation Training
as a result of insurgency activities. It may also be due to
Yes(%)
No(%)
Doctors
redistribution of Pediatric specialists from that region to
Consultants
86
42 (48.8)
44 (51.2)
other regions due to security concerns.
Resident Doctors 86
28 (32.6)
58 (67.4)
χ2 9.15, p 0.025
Medical officer
9
1 (11.1)
8 (88.9)
That most (87.8%) neonatal units were from public and
181
71 (39.2)
110 (60.8)
Nurses
tertiary healthcare facilities (83.9%) may be a true re-
Senior Cadre
14
1 (7.1)
13 (92.9)
flection of the current prevailing national circumstances
NO. Cadre
18
5 (27.8)
13 (72.2)
where highly specialized and cost intensive services are
32
6 (18.8)
26 (81.2)
provided by public sector.
The total number of neonatal ventilators available in the
The fact that many of these hospitals are located in state
newborn units evaluated were 38, located in 23 of the 54
capitals calls for an urgent need to establish networks in
units. The private units have7 (18.4%) while the public
the periphery so as to reduce mortality and morbidity in
communities
13,14
units have 31(81.6%) of the neonatal ventilators. State
.
capitals were the location of 14/22 (63.6%) and 24/38
(63.2%) of the ventilators. They were most commonly
Neonatal Mechanical ventilators were available in only
available in the SW and SS 11(28.9%) and least avail-
half of the centers evaluated with the highest proportion
able in the NE 2 (5.2%). This is shown in Tables 8 & 9.
being in the south West; this highlights the need for es-
Pulse oximeters were available in all (100%) the neona-
tablishment of such services in its simplest form
tal units, multi-parameter monitors in 23 (42.6%) while
throughout the country, whilst more sophistication could
6 (11%) have ABG machines. Four (66.67%) of the
be made available at the regional levels. The regionali-
ABG machines were located in the SS region. Surfactant
zation of services has been linked to neonatal mortality
reduction in Europe and North America
1,5,15,16
replacement services are available in 9 (16.7%) of the
.
units evaluated. For 4 (44.4%) of these units, surfactant
replacement services were provided on request. Five
12
The existence of level I neonatal units or basic care
ability of neonatal MV. MV services are available in
level II neonatal units in developed countries hence the
8
nurseries in teaching hospitals is a misnomer for facili-
ties that ought to give specialized care to referred cases.
drift from MV availability to ventilation strategies or
techniques.
17
Basic or level I neonatal care centers ought to be located
in primary health centers or secondary care facilities. So
that they can provide newborn resuscitation, optimal
It’s noteworthy that some of the neonatal units with MV
postnatal care for every delivery and stabilization of ill
capacity (40.7%) may be suitable for NICU or level III
babies before transport to level II or III facilities. When
care. The number of units 5 (9.3%) with level III neona-
tertiary centers cater for level I or II care, chances are
tal care are appalling hence the dire need to establish
that the newborn services are non-existent in primary or
Regional neonatal centres as centres to provide full
secondary care centers. This may be responsible for the
range of care.
poor quality of neonatal services with the attendant high
neonatal morbidity and mortality in the country.
All the centers have pulse oximetry capacity, while a
quarter (25%) have multi-parameter monitors and only
It’s interesting to note the disproportionate distribution
11% had ABG machines. This shows poor neonatal
of higher levels of neonatal care in the south with only
monitoring infrastructure in the facilities evaluated.
one level III neonatal unit in the North central region.
Critical care decision are dependent on the ability to
This finding may reinforce the quest for regional care
anticipate biochemical abnormalities and confirm
centres in targeted hospitals and scaling up of neonatal
1,5
promptly using these monitoring tools for informed in-
terventions. Paucity of monitoring tools may be a con-
services in the primary and secondary centres which are
tributory factor to the reduced survival of very ill new-
either non-existent or not functional.
borns in the units. The paucity of surfactant replacement
services reduces chances of survival of ELBW and
VLBW babies,
5,18
Most of the doctors at this conference were trained on
whichcontributes to the high National
Neonatal resuscitation through one form of training or
neonatal mortality.
the other; NRT being the most common is a reflection of
the availability of this training annually during the PAN
This study is has attempted to describe the scope and
conference.
quality of neonatal care available in major Nigerian hos-
A reasonable proportion of the nurses were trained on
pitals. It is limited in the sense that it did not assess for
neonatal resuscitation however, the finding that more
sophisticated care such as the availability of parenteral
than one third of nurses were untrained in neonatal re-
alimentation or further sophisticated means of manage-
suscitation is worrisome albeit the lowest cadre being
ment of encephalopathies such as cooling devices and
the most trained. This portends a negative influence on
techniques. However in the assessment, focus was
neonatal survival as more deliveries are supervised by
placed rather on what was considered simpler means of
nurses. The nursing staff are key to the implementation
14
management by the authors such as respiratory support
of community based neonatal care at the hinterlands
which had played a major role in the drastic reduction in
where the delivery of babies needing bag-mask-valve
neonatal mortality in the developed countries. This is
resuscitation mostly occurs. Neonatal resuscitation train-
because prior to the introduction of ventilator support in
ing should be stepped down to nurses in the primary
Europe and North America, the neonatal mortality could
centres as a matter of urgency.
not reduce further than below 35 per thousand live
births . The introduction of ventilator support drove the
18
Half of doctors that have been trained on neonatal MV
reduction in neonatal mortality. All the respondents uni-
are consultants; the medical officers have the fewest
formly had available means of thermal regulation
proportion of trained personnel. This finding ought to
through the use of incubator care even though the quan-
translate to a highly skilled and responsive neonatal sur-
tity of incubators to the ratio of babies catered for was
vival systems and teams in the different centres. How-
not estimated. The ratio of support health personnel to
ever this was not verified in this study.
patient was equally not assessed.
Only few of the nurses were trained in neonatal MV,
The findings from this study is far below what is found
with the lowest cadre being the most trained group a
in developed countries of Europe , North America and
reversal of the trend observed among doctors. This find-
south Africa where Standard level of Intensive care
ing is thought provoking as skilled medical and nursing
Units are available and these countries can provide for
personnel is key to successful mechanical ventilation
the various levels of care ranging from level 1 to level 3
service. This maybe one of the reasons for the unavail-
to 4. In most countries of Africa there is scarcity of pub-
ability and non-commencement of this service in some
lished data on the tiered system of care. In other coun-
tertiary hospitals evaluated.
tries of West Africa like Ghana, there is the capacity for
the provision of level 1,2 and one or two level 3 hospi-
The finding of slightly above one third of tertiary neona-
tals. In Countries of East Africa where there may be
tal centres having MV facilities is a reflection of the
paucity of level 3 neonatal care services, there is scarcity
poor neonatal infrastructural capacities. There are no
of published data on the tired care. It is therefore appar-
similar publications known to the authors from resource
ent that the level of available care is driven by the avail-
poor and high neonatal mortality settings on the avail-
able resources allocable to the health care services.
13
Despite the limitations of this survey, it has given an
cities. Such basic neonatal care is scarce in the commu-
indication of the impact of allocation of limited resource
nities
to health care services in general and more importantly
the effect of none prioritization of neonatal care in the
Recommendations
scope of maternal and child care. Health sector funding
should therefore be refocused with emphasis placed on
More in-depth Assessment should provide for evaluation
the improved funding of hospitals as the panacea for
of availability of feeding modalities
better scope and quality of neonatal care services.
More resources should be allocated to health to ensure
provision of improved neonatal health care resources
Funding does not have to come strictly from government
Regionalization of higher level care, networking and
directly. It could come from private investors, from vari-
community linkage may be the panacea for the prevent-
ous sectors of the economic community but there should
able deaths and diseases of newborn babies.
be a well-coordinated mechanism for this source of
funding to ensure a sustainable source. Such funding
Limitations
source could come from some foundations or compa-
nies. Various innovative means could be focussed upon
The study did not evaluate for sophisticated care such as
and stake holders can focus on exploring creative means
the availability of parenteral alimentation or further
of identification of sustainable funding mechanisms for
sophisticated means of management of encephalopathy
health sector and neonatal health.
such as cooling devices and techniques or the admini-
stration of Nitric Oxide.
Conflict of interest: None
Conclusion
Funding: None
Neonatal care in Nigeria is still in evolution. The peak of
the medical personnel are skilled but the lower medical,
Acknowledgements
senior and intermediate nursing care staff are unskilled
for critical neonatal care service. Basic neonatal care is
The Authors gratefully acknowledge the co-operation of
widespread in major public and private centers in major
all the respondents to the questionnaire for taking of
their valuable time to complete the questionnaire
References
1.
Bode MM, O’shea TM, Metzguer
7.
Williams RL, Chen PM. Identify-
12. Louis D. Pollack, Ian M. Ratner,
KR, Stiles AD. Perinatal
ing the sources of the recent de-
Greg C. Lund DO. United States
regionalization andneonatal
cline in perinatal mortality rates in
Neonatology Practice Survey: Per-
mortality in North Carolina, 1968 –
California. N Engl J Med. 1982;
sonnel, Practice, Hospital, and
1994. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
306:207 – 214.
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Char-
2001;184(6):1302 – 1307
8.
Levels of Neonatal Care.
acteristics. PEDIATRICS Vol. 101
2.
MacDorman MF, Kirmeyer S.
Committee on fetus and newborn.
No. 3 March 1998.
Fetal and perinatal mortality,
Pediatrics 2012;130;587; originally
13. Saving newborn lives in Nigeria:
United States, 2005. Natl Vital
published online August 27, 2012
Newborn health in the context of
Stat Rep. 2009;57(8):1 – 19.
doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1999.
the Integrated Maternal, Newborn
3.
Stahlman MT. Newborn intensive
9.
March of Dimes, Committee on
and Child Health Strategy. Abuja:
care: success or failure? J Pediatr.
Perinatal Health. Toward
Federal Ministry of Health, Save
1984;105:162 – 167.
Improving the Outcome of
the Children, ACCESS; 2009. Full
4.
Hack M, Wright LL, Shankaran S
Pregnancy: Recommendations for
report with references and detailed
etal. Very low birth weight out-
the Regional Development of
data sources available on
comes of the National Institute of
Maternal and Perinatal Health
www.savethechildren.org/savenew
Child Health and Human Develop-
Services. White Plains, NY: March
borns.
ment Neonatal Network, Novem-
of Dimes National Foundation;
14. National Population Commission
ber 1989 to October 1990. Am J
1976.
(NPC) [Nigeria] and ICF
Obstet Gynecol. 1995;172:457 –
10. Richardson DK, Reed K, Cutler
International. Nigeria
464.
JC, et al. Perinatal regionalization
Demographic and Health Survey
5.
Horwood SP, Boyle MP, Torrance
versus hospital competition: the
2013. Abuja, Nigeria, and
GW, Sinclair JC. Mortality and
Hartford example. Pediatrics.
Rockville, Maryland, USA: NPC
morbidity of 500 to 1,499 gram
1995;96(3 pt 1):417 – 423.
and ICF International; 2014.
birth weight infants live-born to
11. Yeast JD, Poskin M, Stockbauer
15. American Academy of Pediatrics
residents of a defined geographic
JW, Shaffer S. Changing patterns
and the American College of Ob-
region before and after neonatal
in regionalization of perinatal care
stetrics and Gynecology. Guide-
intensive care. Pediatrics.
and the impact on neonatal
lines for Perinatal Care. 5th ed. Elk
1982;69:613 – 620.
mortality. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
Grove Village, IL: American
6.
Lee KS, Paneth N, Gartner LM,
1998;178(1 pt 1):131 – 135.
Academy of Pediatrics; Washing-
Pearlman MA, Gruss L. Neonatal
ton, DC: American College of
mortality: an analysis of the recent
Obstetrics and Gynecology; 2002.
improvement in the United States. Am
2.
J Public Health. 1980;70:15 – 21.
14
16. Horbar JD, Badger GJ, Carpenter
17. Steven MD, Sunil KS.Invasive and
18. Kamath BD, MacGuire ER,
JH, et al. Trends in mortality and
Noninvasive Neonatal Mechanical
McClure EM, Goldenberg RL,
morbidity for very low birth
Ventilation. Respir Care 2003;48
Jobe AH. Neonatal Mortality From
weight infants, 1991 – 1999. Pedi-
(4):426 – 439 .
Respiratory Distress Syndrome:
atrics 2002;110 (Part 1):143 – 51.
Lessons for Low Resource
Countries. Pediatrics 2011: 127:
1139 – 1146.